Civilization, Phaze III

Second Thoughts On

CIVILIZATION, PHAZE III

[Updated February 5, 2000]

INTRODUCTION

Civilization, Phaze III—Frank Zappa's much-anticipated final work—was released by the Zappa Family Trust in January, 1995. I wrote the following review shortly thereafter:

The meaning and significance of Civilization, Phaze III will be debated for many years to come. It is an elaborate sound-puzzle composed of bizarre dialogue and uncompromising music, all overhung by the specter of Zappa's impending death. Zappa worked intermittently on the project for more than a decade, and there is little doubt that his intentions for the album changed during that time. As Gail Zappa (Frank's wife) observes: "Phaze III probably started off to be one thing, but because Frank worked so hard to finish it before he died, it became something a little different...." 1

Civilization, Phaze III depicts a bleak and surrealistic world in which a diverse group of individuals—first heard on 1967's Lumpy Gravy2 have taken refuge inside a giant piano. Like people anywhere and anytime, these folks have difficulty getting along with one another. But they are also menaced by a force of reactionary "pigs" and "ponies" living outside the piano. The situation is charged with tension and uneasiness, and this is reflected in the predominantly dark tones of everything from the music to the album package itself (the two CDs are pure black).

While Civilization, Phaze III is often strange and forbidding, it also contains the finest Synclavier work of Zappa's career. This is partly due to improvements in technology, as Zappa explained to Downbeat in 1991: "I bought a direct-to-disc system, sixteen tracks, about an hour per track. I've expanded the RAM, expanded the number of voices in the machine. In the real world instruments don't just shut off after you've played a note; if you don't have enough RAM to hold your samples, then you have to use short samples or looped samples, which sound unrealistic. When you have more RAM space, you can use longer samples and because the ring-off is more natural, the things tend to sound better." 3

These improvements are readily apparent on Phaze III. Although the bulk of the album was recorded on Synclavier, a few of the parts were generated the old-fashioned way by men and women playing traditional acoustic instruments. But which is which? The quality of the sampled material is such that it is virtually impossible to distinguish between synthesized and human performance.

Phaze III is more than just a technological breakthrough, however. Zappa always made certain that the gadgetry was subservient to the music. In this case, he used the tools at his disposal to create a dazzling universe of sound that will keep fans of his work listening with awe, fascination, amusement, and varying degrees of bewilderment for the rest of their lives. Who could ask for more?

Well—in answer to my own question—I guess I could. The past five years have not been particularly kind to Civilization, Phaze III. While I still regard the album as a masterpiece, the additional time I've spent with it has convinced me that it is deeply flawed as well. As I'll explain in the following sections, I think this has to do with both the materials that Zappa used to create Phaze III as well as the circumstances of its creation.

THE PROBLEM WITH PIANO PEOPLE

Frank Zappa's decision to utilize more of the 1967 piano people recordings first heard on Lumpy Gravy thoroughly colors Civilization, Phaze III. These conversations are so completely woven into the fabric of the album that it is impossible to isolate them from the music. As Zappa put it in a marathon interview with Don Menn in 1992: "not only do we have these smooth transitions from different days and different groups of people inside the piano, but they also blend seamlessly into the Synclavier pieces. So the piano overhang, which would be the result of voices setting the strings in motion, will be overhanging the start of the Synclavier piece, and the last chord of a piece will be ringing off into the piano as they come in talking again." 4 Although this blend of dialogue and music is a remarkable technological feat, we can still ask whether it makes for good art. One way of deciding the issue is to examine the relationship of Lumpy Gravy to Civilization, Phaze III.

Zappa describes Gravy as "a curiously inconsistent piece which started out as a ballet, but probably didn't make it." 5 Although this is a classic example of Zappian reverse psychology, it is also an unintentionally apt description of the album. Lumpy Gravy is scattered and unfocused, a mish-mash of spoken word recordings (both piano people and others), short orchestral pieces (some melodic, some rather abstract), various speeded-up recordings, and brief snatches of rock and roll. Ever the dedicated composer, Zappa probably intended Lumpy Gravy to be a vehicle for his modern orchestral music. But the balance is off: there is far too little of this music in the mix. As the listener's attention ricochets from one thing to another—humor to music to field recording, with no discernible connection between them—he is left to wonder what Zappa had in mind with this intriguing but badly fractured work.

Civilization, Phaze III corrects most of these problems. Here, the confusion of elements on Lumpy Gravy is reduced to just music and piano people, in an agreeable ratio of four to one. Unfortunately—as with his "ballet" intentions on Gravy—Zappa had loftier goals in mind. The liner notes proclaim Civilization, Phaze III to be an "opera-pantomime, with choreographed physical activity." 6 But no matter how painstakingly edited the conversations on Phaze III or how artfully assembled the packaging, with its suggestive imagery and detailed libretto, the fact remains that all of the spoken material was generated by people asked to "stick their head inside [a piano] and ramble incoherently…" 7 Despite Zappa's efforts to shape these ramblings into a penetrating sociological statement, Civilization, Phaze III's "story-line" is a shambles. While I really do enjoy listening to the piano people talk—the tonal quality of their voices and the earnestness of their discussions are both quite entertaining—I do not believe that they have anything meaningful to say.

Act II suffers the worst. Not only is there twice as much talk in this part of the program, 8 but Zappa's decision to "update" the setting with new voices comes off poorly. As with the original cast of piano people, there are some amusing moments—mostly generated by actor Michael Rappaport—but by and large the new group just doesn't fit in. The many references to contemporary culture circa 1991 make the second disc sound dated. Furthermore, the nearly-continuous bickering among the newbies quickly becomes tiresome.

Perhaps my biggest complaint, however, is that Zappa has forever linked this wonderfully bizarre music with a bogus tale of civilization's downfall. Oddly enough, he decries a similar linkage in a 1981 interview regarding the music of his hero, Edgard Varèse: "Anytime you watch a show on television and there's a scary scene and there's a sustained chord and one or two tiny little percussion bips in the background, you'll know that the guy who wrote that movie score, that TV score, never would have thought of it unless Varèse had done it first…But he didn't write the things to be scary, I don't think. He just wrote them because he was dealing with musical raw materials in a very individualistic way." 9 In a parallel sense, I doubt that Zappa was thinking about the fall of modern civilization when he wrote "N-Lite;" it is more likely that he was simply mixing and matching sounds that appealed to him. In other words: the music came first, the concept was applied later.

I just wish that Zappa had allowed his listeners the same opportunity. It's like the difference between reading a book and seeing the film adaptation. While reading gives you the freedom to create your own images, a movie insists "this is how it's supposed to look." With all due respect to Frank, I prefer not to be encumbered by the narrative he grafted onto this music. I would rather hear Civilization, Phaze III as pure sound.

A RACE AGAINST TIME

Now, what about the circumstances surrounding the creation of Civilization, Phaze III? How did they affect its outcome?

In a 1996 radio documentary, Beverly D'Angelo and Spencer Chrislu outline the horrendous impact that cancer had on Zappa's ability to work: "In the end, it became a race against time for Frank. For him a normal day was eighteen hours. If he got really excited or really focused on something, he'd work 25, 26 hours…and then go to bed after that just because he had to do something. So I think [Frank] felt…that he was cutting way back to work only twelve hours." 10

It is easy to imagine that Frank's reduced time and energy level had a significant impact on Civilization, Phaze III, especially Act II. As Frank told Don Menn in 1992: "I finally finished disc one [my emphasis] of the Civilization, Phaze III album, which is something that I've been promising for years and years." 11 In fact, we learn that the centerpiece of disc one, "N-Lite," took Frank ten years to complete. Considering that Zappa had little more than a year to live at the time he spoke to Menn, that he was working on several projects at once, and that the number of hours per day he could stand to work was steadily declining, it is obvious that he had far less time to complete disc two than he did disc one.

Much as I hate to say it, I think it shows in the results. Disc one is virtually perfect. The music is extremely rich, with layer upon layer of sounds carefully arranged into each selection. This music is unlike anything heard before, a truly startling experience. For disc two to even equal this achievement—especially considering the incredible impact of "N-Lite"—would be a tremendous challenge under the best of circumstances. And Frank's circumstances were far from the best.

As a result, the music on disc two simply does not measure up to the standards set by such magnificent pieces as "Put A Motor In Yourself," "Reagan At Bitburg," "Buffalo Voice" and "N-Lite." Instead, many of Act II's compositions come off as sketches: pieces that might have been made of sturdier stuff if Zappa had had more time to perfect them. "Gross Man" meanders. "I Was In A Drum" and "A Pig With Wings" are empty displays of virtuosity. "Hot And Putrid" is a throwaway track. And so on.

The two longest tracks on the second disc—"Dio Fa" and "Beat The Reaper"—present a different problem for me. Both are reminiscent of music that Wendy Carlos recorded years previously. "Dio Fa" has much the same character as a piece called "Incantation" on Carlos' Beauty In The Beast, 12 while "Beat The Reaper" utilizes the same rainfall-against-electronics motif as "Spring" from the Sonic Seasonings album. 13 While there is no way of knowing whether Frank was influenced by either of these compositions—and both are certainly far less sophisticated than the material on Phaze III—it is still very disconcerting to hear anything by Zappa that sounds even vaguely derivative of another artist's work. It is the kind of thing that sets one's teeth on edge. 14

Finally, there is the ultimate disappointment of the album's concluding track, "Waffenspiel." It is difficult for me to even account for Zappa's thinking here. After thrilling the listener with over an hour and a half—that's minus the talk—of brilliant (and sometimes brilliantly frustrating) musical sounds, to have the album end with four minutes of gunfire, barking dogs, automobile noises and an airplane flying overhead comes as a tremendous letdown. Even the two minutes of grating feedback that conclude Weasels Ripped My Flesh 15 seem enlightening by comparison. And when one recalls the truly awe-inspiring finishes that Zappa was capable of—for example "Strictly Genteel" on You Can't Do That On Stage Anymore, Volume #6 16 or "Yo Mama" on Sheik Yerbouti17 it is very disheartening to have one of his most vital albums fade anonymously into silence. 18

CONCLUSION: OF ALL THE NERVE…

Way back in 1987, Frank challenged his critics to do their homework before daring to snub his music. He characterized his albums as "a catalog of the various experiments [I've undertaken]. Whether or not the experiment is successful or a failure, you be the judge….But before you judge, you should really ask yourself whether you have enough data to make that judgment. For a guy who has never heard Anton Webern or Igor Stravinsky or Edgard Varèse or Takemitsu or Ligeti or Penderecki….If you don't know what that stuff is, where it comes from, what it sounds like, and what the intention of it is, how can you even attempt to take a guess at what extrapolations you may be hearing [from me]?" 19

Well…you've got me there, Frank. I do need to search out and listen to those composers, as well as others that you've mentioned over the years like Elliot Carter, Oliver Messiaen, Conlon Nancarrow, John Cage, Pierre Boulez, Charles Ives, Alban Berg, Karlheinz Stockhausen, George Anthiel and Leo Ornstein. While I'm at it, I should probably listen to what musicians are doing with electronics today. Maybe find out just what this "techno" thing is all about.

Once I've absorbed all that information, Civilization, Phaze III may sound better to me. Perhaps I'll even learn to appreciate Act II. But despite the imperfections I see in it today, Civilization, Phaze III is still an album of tremendous importance. It raises the bar, by several notches, of what is required from both composer and listener. Certainly, it has forever changed the way that I hear music. Even if my impression of Civilization, Phaze III never becomes more favorable, that is a powerful thing to say about any work of art.


ENDNOTES

1. Rense, Rip. "'Civilization' à la Zappa." The Los Angeles Times. December 6, 1994. Page F5. Online version.

(Return To Article)

2. Zappa, Frank. Lumpy Gravy. Rykodisc RCD 10504. 1995.

(Return To Article)

3. Davis, Michael. "Frank Zappa Makes A Jazz Noise." Downbeat. July, 1991. Page 29.

(Return To Article)

4. Menn, Don. "The Mother Of All Interviews." A Definitive Tribute To Frank Zappa. 1994. Page 69. Online version.

(Return To Article)

5. Zappa, Frank. Lumpy Gravy. Rykodisc RCD 10504. 1995. Album cover.

(Return To Article)

6. Zappa, Frank. Civilization, Phaze III. UMRK 01. 1994. CD booklet, page 3.

(Return To Article)

7. Zappa, Frank. Civilization, Phaze III. UMRK 01. 1994. CD booklet, page 2.

(Return To Article)

8. There are over 49 minutes of music on disc one of Civilization, Phaze III and just under 7 minutes of dialogue. On disc two, there are less than 43 minutes of music (under 39 if you subtract "Waffenspiel") and almost 15 minutes of dialogue.

(Return To Article)

9. Diliberto, John and Haas, Kimberly. "Frank Zappa on Edgard Varèse." Downbeat. November, 1981. Page 22. Online version.

(Return To Article)

10. Abrams, Larry. Frank Zappa, American Composer. Produced by Steve Rowland and Gail Zappa. Public Radio International. 1996. Online version.

(Return To Article)

11. Menn, Don. "The Mother Of All Interviews." A Definitive Tribute To Frank Zappa. 1994. Page 69. Online version.

(Return To Article)

12. Carlos, Wendy. Beauty In The Beast. Audion (Jem) SYN 200. 1986.

(Return To Article)

13. Carlos, Wendy. Sonic Seasonings. Columbia KG 31234. 1972.

(Return To Article)

14. Although Zappa had few peers in the ultra-specialized realm he inhabited, he does share several working principles with composer and pioneer electronic musician Wendy Carlos. Both Zappa and Carlos are meticulous and exacting artists, often spending years on a given project. Both believe that electronic orchestrations can renew interest in the work of long-dead composers: Carlos with her justly-famous Bach series and Zappa with an album of music by the (unrelated) 18th century composer Francesco Zappa. Both use specialized recording techniques—what Carlos refers to as "performance values"—to instill human warmth and feeling into machine-generated music. Both take advantage of technology to create moods and textures unlike anything ever heard before. By contrast, the most important difference between the two is that of method. Zappa wholeheartedly embraced sampling technology—via the Synclavier—in order to obtain his palette of sounds, whereas Carlos constructs her sounds completely from scratch. [For more information on Carlos, visit the Wendy Carlos Homepage.]

(Return To Article)

15. Zappa, Frank. Weasels Ripped My Flesh. Rykodisc RCD 10510. 1995.

(Return To Article)

16. Zappa, Frank. You Can't Do That On Stage Anymore, Volume 6. Rykodisc RCD 10571/72. 1995.

(Return To Article)

17. Zappa, Frank. Sheik Yerbouti. Rykodisc RCD 10528. 1995.

(Return To Article)

18. Civilization, Phaze III's surprisingly feeble conclusion inevitably leads to speculation regarding Zappa's motives. So…what if Frank intended the sheer blandness of "Waffenspiel" to bridge the gap between the extraordinary world of the album and the listener's own reality? In this imagined scenario, it is as if Zappa were saying: "guess what, folks: whether you know it or not, you're living in Civilization, Phaze III!" While this sounds plausible, it just doesn't pan out. Besides the problems I've already discussed with the album's muddled narrative, "Waffenspiel" drags on far too long to bridge anything besides the gap between interest and boredom. That being the case, it's the final nail in the coffin for the second disc of this album. Call it musique concrete if you want. It's still a bummer.

(Return To Article)

19. Doerschuk, Robert L. and Aikin, Jim. "Jazz From Hell." A Definitive Tribute To Frank Zappa. 1994. Page 53. Online version.

(Return To Article)

BACK TO "ZAPPA FILES"